|
01-26-2018, 08:06 AM | #1 |
Working Mother
|
Holy sheet thats a small bed. Think there will be a longbed option?
|
01-26-2018, 08:34 AM | #2 | |||
- The Don -
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: MN
Posts: 48,460
|
Yeah, it ain't no joke
Quote:
Quote:
Tell me why, cuz I'd think there'd be some sort of movement issues...unless I'm seeing it wrong. And the rounded edges are going to take some getting used to, really like how AEV did them, and the bed. I do like the JL top tho, real sleek...and the extra space they created by moving the wiper below, why did it take them so long Anyway, this is what the damn thing should look like Only thing I've never really liked about it is the fact that the bed doesn't line up w/ the hard top...looks odd when removed. I digress... Quote:
Super excited to see these on the road, unmasked!!
__________________
To each his own. Not all those who wander are lost. The great irony - triggered snowflakes accusing triggered snowflakes of being triggered snowflakes |
|||
01-26-2018, 08:48 AM | #3 |
AKA: jeepnski
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 16,550
|
less material is the biggest, so that's cheaper to make and less hidden structure/weight you gota haul around every day.
it includes the body to bed gap in the fender opening, means a larger possible opening from the start for tire clearance and i just like how it should combine the body n bed to a more seamless set of lines vs 2 separate bits like a standard truck. |
01-26-2018, 09:09 AM | #4 | |||
old and boring
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 33,878
|
JL comparably equipped to a JK is only I think $1-2k more. Problem is, most of them currently out there are loaded to the gills and the price is jacked up accordingly. They offer way more widgets and doohickeys in them now, so the max price is higher. Of course that's all the haters see and b1tch about, but that's inevitable.
Quote:
Quote:
There will be a lot of Brute design cues on JT. FCA has had them in their design studio for years. They've been wanting to make one for a loooong time but it was too late in JK product cycle to justify the expense. People don't realize the true cost of design, validation, testing, tooling, etc, etc. Sounds like the JT is an entirely unique vehicle compared to JL. It almost needs to be since the body structure no longer adds rigidity to the frame once you get past the rear seats and it's still meant to ride/handle properly and be able to carry a load. Should have much better payload than any Wrangler we've seen, but I doubt it'll be 1/2 ton truck territory. Colorado/Ranger if we're lucky. But as I said above, it's a niche vehicle and will probably be out of price range for most people who want to use it like a truck anyway. Quote:
Like these, but now a separate piece: Last edited by bbaCJ8; 01-26-2018 at 09:11 AM. |
|||
01-26-2018, 07:08 PM | #5 | |
Working Mother
|
Quote:
|
|
01-26-2018, 06:38 PM | #6 |
Working Mother
|
|
01-27-2018, 05:35 PM | #7 | |
I run this joint
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 136,698
|
Quote:
With the requisite 2-3" lift and 35-37" tires it's going to dwarf the Taco though. Untitled by Jason West, on Flickr |
|
01-26-2018, 08:48 AM | #8 |
I run this joint
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 136,698
|
|
|
|